<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Weekly Reconciliation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on History Not Worth Repeating by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=378&#038;cpage=1#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=378#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Kind if a fractured economics lesson.  For one, there is not really a party affiliation to fiscal or mometary policy.  We have both government spending and a Fed regardless of what party is in or if no particular party is in power.  The Repubs have been the ones lately to speak of the stimulative effect of tax cuts.  The Left doesn&#039;t talk of much stimulative.  If anything the Right has been fiscalist.

Also there is a 3rd option to paying or defaulting on debt, and that is leaving it out there and paying interest on it.  Don&#039;t say it is not legitimate.  Except for Clinton, every government in the last 50 years has used this strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind if a fractured economics lesson.  For one, there is not really a party affiliation to fiscal or mometary policy.  We have both government spending and a Fed regardless of what party is in or if no particular party is in power.  The Repubs have been the ones lately to speak of the stimulative effect of tax cuts.  The Left doesn&#8217;t talk of much stimulative.  If anything the Right has been fiscalist.</p>
<p>Also there is a 3rd option to paying or defaulting on debt, and that is leaving it out there and paying interest on it.  Don&#8217;t say it is not legitimate.  Except for Clinton, every government in the last 50 years has used this strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on History Not Worth Repeating by Dave Small</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=378&#038;cpage=1#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=378#comment-764</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all a confidence game now thanks to our reserve currency status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all a confidence game now thanks to our reserve currency status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fe by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=351#comment-719</guid>
		<description>They aren&#039;t looking for a disproportionate but a proportionate response from Germany based on their economic means.  And the incentive for Germany to intervene will be for the benefit of Germany... to stem the outright default of Greece and the hardship and emigration that will radiate from Greece out to the other member countries.  They already are an economic union and Greece&#039;s problem IS their problem.  What was your point, admiration of Bismarck who was an imperialist and stole iron districts from France and other land from the Ottoman Empire?  Reagan was somewhat like Bismarck.  So was Bush II.  And the analogy is that we have someone in office who has sought to unite Congress after the Bush debacle and solve Bush&#039;s spending disaster together... But it doesn&#039;t seem to be appreciated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They aren&#8217;t looking for a disproportionate but a proportionate response from Germany based on their economic means.  And the incentive for Germany to intervene will be for the benefit of Germany&#8230; to stem the outright default of Greece and the hardship and emigration that will radiate from Greece out to the other member countries.  They already are an economic union and Greece&#8217;s problem IS their problem.  What was your point, admiration of Bismarck who was an imperialist and stole iron districts from France and other land from the Ottoman Empire?  Reagan was somewhat like Bismarck.  So was Bush II.  And the analogy is that we have someone in office who has sought to unite Congress after the Bush debacle and solve Bush&#8217;s spending disaster together&#8230; But it doesn&#8217;t seem to be appreciated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alexander the Broke by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=328&#038;cpage=1#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=328#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Among the options: would Greece be allowed to print Euros?  There is a European Central Bank that would disallow that.  Not among your options:  that Greece continues to float debt to pay its deficit spending.  Their debt becomes so risky it is worthless and doesn&#039;t find a buyer.  They are unable to make payments, and default.  The jobs that are paid by the government cease to exist and there is poverty and unrest.  There are refugees and emigration.

The problem IS an EU problem, and I don&#039;t know the rules for dealing with a problem country that doesn&#039;t live within its means.  can they expel them?  

Otherwise, within the EU, it will be cheaper to support a plan by Greece to  get bailed out. They actually have the leverage of &quot;the stick&quot; because they could otherwise default, which will cost more to the other EU bondholders. 

Were you making anlaogies to the American economy?  Because it is ridiculous for us to consider our deficits before we first consider our economy and jobs.  Think: you could have a deficit of -0- if you eliminated ALL government spending, haha but you wouldn;t want the implications.  Our government needs to first support the productivity and stability of our people, which provided the engine for us to have had a balanced budget through the period of the 90&#039;s etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the options: would Greece be allowed to print Euros?  There is a European Central Bank that would disallow that.  Not among your options:  that Greece continues to float debt to pay its deficit spending.  Their debt becomes so risky it is worthless and doesn&#8217;t find a buyer.  They are unable to make payments, and default.  The jobs that are paid by the government cease to exist and there is poverty and unrest.  There are refugees and emigration.</p>
<p>The problem IS an EU problem, and I don&#8217;t know the rules for dealing with a problem country that doesn&#8217;t live within its means.  can they expel them?  </p>
<p>Otherwise, within the EU, it will be cheaper to support a plan by Greece to  get bailed out. They actually have the leverage of &#8220;the stick&#8221; because they could otherwise default, which will cost more to the other EU bondholders. </p>
<p>Were you making anlaogies to the American economy?  Because it is ridiculous for us to consider our deficits before we first consider our economy and jobs.  Think: you could have a deficit of -0- if you eliminated ALL government spending, haha but you wouldn;t want the implications.  Our government needs to first support the productivity and stability of our people, which provided the engine for us to have had a balanced budget through the period of the 90&#8217;s etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Knowing It All Means Not Knowing Much by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=322&#038;cpage=1#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=322#comment-671</guid>
		<description>I assume this won&#039;t become a comment, I just wanted to reach out.

Interesting.  As an editorial staff of Internal Auditor magazine, I reviewed an article from a prospective futurist who supposed what was going to happen in the profession 10 years from now.  His answer to the question was that there would be a lot more systems, expert systems, automatic reporting etc.  

I indicated that the premise of the article had to be expanded, first of all why should we care about what the profession is in 10 years?  And then, is that all there is, it will become an IT profession?

See, to your question of knowing more is knowing less about what is beyond.  The person was trying to create interest about wanting to know more about the future, but didn&#039;t say why we would want to know more, nor had a very exciting prediction...

If I had written the article, I would say that we want to speculate on the future in IA because we want to try to anticipate it with the proper leadership in creating control mechanisms at the leadership level: regulations, structures for control etc.

And the future is going to include a lot of humans making programming mistakes, not monitoring effectively, trying to bypass systems, trying to program fraud or avoiding detection of fraud through steering programming away from it.  And leading reporting efforts that don&#039;t fairly capture the substance of the transactions they are doing. 

There will be plenty of work.  Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume this won&#8217;t become a comment, I just wanted to reach out.</p>
<p>Interesting.  As an editorial staff of Internal Auditor magazine, I reviewed an article from a prospective futurist who supposed what was going to happen in the profession 10 years from now.  His answer to the question was that there would be a lot more systems, expert systems, automatic reporting etc.  </p>
<p>I indicated that the premise of the article had to be expanded, first of all why should we care about what the profession is in 10 years?  And then, is that all there is, it will become an IT profession?</p>
<p>See, to your question of knowing more is knowing less about what is beyond.  The person was trying to create interest about wanting to know more about the future, but didn&#8217;t say why we would want to know more, nor had a very exciting prediction&#8230;</p>
<p>If I had written the article, I would say that we want to speculate on the future in IA because we want to try to anticipate it with the proper leadership in creating control mechanisms at the leadership level: regulations, structures for control etc.</p>
<p>And the future is going to include a lot of humans making programming mistakes, not monitoring effectively, trying to bypass systems, trying to program fraud or avoiding detection of fraud through steering programming away from it.  And leading reporting efforts that don&#8217;t fairly capture the substance of the transactions they are doing. </p>
<p>There will be plenty of work.  Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get Your Ticket Punched by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=316&#038;cpage=1#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=316#comment-653</guid>
		<description>You would have liked David Hackworth&#039;s book, About Face.  He was the most decorated soldier in the Vietnam and Korean Wars, and turned into an anti-war activist at the end because of the Army&#039;s focus on strategic bombing rather than troop and anti-guerrilla tactics.  He was right... and we made the same mistake in Iraq even though the Army War College, State Department, and the most experienced general at the time, Gen. Shinseki, were right.   There is no way of telling whether the training, certification or promotion regimens of either business or the military services are right or wrong except by listening to the most experienced people on the ground.  That&#039;s it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would have liked David Hackworth&#8217;s book, About Face.  He was the most decorated soldier in the Vietnam and Korean Wars, and turned into an anti-war activist at the end because of the Army&#8217;s focus on strategic bombing rather than troop and anti-guerrilla tactics.  He was right&#8230; and we made the same mistake in Iraq even though the Army War College, State Department, and the most experienced general at the time, Gen. Shinseki, were right.   There is no way of telling whether the training, certification or promotion regimens of either business or the military services are right or wrong except by listening to the most experienced people on the ground.  That&#8217;s it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alternatives to Reality by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=313&#038;cpage=1#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=313#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Are you a free-market guy or not?  Cap and trade is the free-market solution.  Economy-limiting measures have to be led by the strongest economic countries including the US and EU, and others will follow, because we will then sanction them in order to trade with us. But only if we start.  And by starting, we will gain the upper hand in manufacturing and innovation, which will boost our economy.  See aerospace, military, computers, etc. industries. 

What do you suggest by social unrest?  I think it will be peaceful.  London&#039;s bankers were just hit by a 50% windfall tax on their excess bonuses over $40,000.  But I didn&#039;t hear of the related news story about revolutions, pitchforks, new pilgrim boats, etc.  We should have a similar windfall tax and we will expect peace as well, in the greatest country in the world, in spite of heathcare that rivals Turkey&#039;s, the most prominent EU country that hasn&#039;t nationalized yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a free-market guy or not?  Cap and trade is the free-market solution.  Economy-limiting measures have to be led by the strongest economic countries including the US and EU, and others will follow, because we will then sanction them in order to trade with us. But only if we start.  And by starting, we will gain the upper hand in manufacturing and innovation, which will boost our economy.  See aerospace, military, computers, etc. industries. </p>
<p>What do you suggest by social unrest?  I think it will be peaceful.  London&#8217;s bankers were just hit by a 50% windfall tax on their excess bonuses over $40,000.  But I didn&#8217;t hear of the related news story about revolutions, pitchforks, new pilgrim boats, etc.  We should have a similar windfall tax and we will expect peace as well, in the greatest country in the world, in spite of heathcare that rivals Turkey&#8217;s, the most prominent EU country that hasn&#8217;t nationalized yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alternatives to Reality by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=313&#038;cpage=1#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=313#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm, c.d. seems to be going around.  

Threat of filibuster in the Senate is on 80% of the bills with the new Republican majority, it was at 20% under the Democratic minority under Bush.  The Repubs reject single-payer or government-owned healthcare, while we praise Medicare and the Veteran&#039;s Administration, successful examples of each in this country, with administrative costs of 2%, as opposed to the healthcare companies&#039;s 20%.  No, a clear-thinking financial person like you or I should have NO IDEA how costs could be saved here I suppose.

We&#039;ve screwed the value of our own currency through Bush-era deficits after a Clinton surplus.  Two unfunded wars helped.  It&#039;s a free world and in honesty, the Euro is a safer haven than the dollar now.  What this will likely cause is $4-5 per gallon gas and austerity that will finally drive us toward energy independence.

Any opinions about the economy are unfounded: do you know the joke about the economists, one said the economy was improving, the other said it was deteriorating, and the answer was that they were both wrong, haha.  But optimism is always called for: you , as a Keynesian should recognize that optimism will hold off the thrift paradox, people saving and not pumping money into the recovery.

To finish with a joke: are you going to believe me or your own eyes?  haha Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, c.d. seems to be going around.  </p>
<p>Threat of filibuster in the Senate is on 80% of the bills with the new Republican majority, it was at 20% under the Democratic minority under Bush.  The Repubs reject single-payer or government-owned healthcare, while we praise Medicare and the Veteran&#8217;s Administration, successful examples of each in this country, with administrative costs of 2%, as opposed to the healthcare companies&#8217;s 20%.  No, a clear-thinking financial person like you or I should have NO IDEA how costs could be saved here I suppose.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve screwed the value of our own currency through Bush-era deficits after a Clinton surplus.  Two unfunded wars helped.  It&#8217;s a free world and in honesty, the Euro is a safer haven than the dollar now.  What this will likely cause is $4-5 per gallon gas and austerity that will finally drive us toward energy independence.</p>
<p>Any opinions about the economy are unfounded: do you know the joke about the economists, one said the economy was improving, the other said it was deteriorating, and the answer was that they were both wrong, haha.  But optimism is always called for: you , as a Keynesian should recognize that optimism will hold off the thrift paradox, people saving and not pumping money into the recovery.</p>
<p>To finish with a joke: are you going to believe me or your own eyes?  haha Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alternatives to Reality by Dave Small</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=313&#038;cpage=1#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=313#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Another term for cognitive dissonance is double think coined by George Orwell. We may start hearing more about him in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another term for cognitive dissonance is double think coined by George Orwell. We may start hearing more about him in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Brewster Wood People by Dan Helming</title>
		<link>http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=300&#038;cpage=1#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Helming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weeklyrecon.com/?p=300#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement with your points about needing to create things here.  But the software etc. ARE things that are being created here.  Though they are intangible, they begin a string of value in capturing people&#039;s interests and hosting advertising and sales of merchandise.  Use mlb.com as an example of the wave of integrated information and sales...  And they are uniquely American: Americans know best how to devise software that will capture other Americans&#039;s imagination.  As far as creating other goods, lately nothing beats the price of goods arriving on a slow boat from emerging Asian countries, or else Target and Walmart would have thought of it.  And farm labor is done by the underclass here.  If you doubt that, check out articles about how Colorado&#039;s apples went unpicked when the Feds cracked down on the underclass there.  Some things may change:  with our federal deficit reaching 10% of our GNP this year, the most since WWII, our currency will devalue and we may become a cheap manufacturer again... or our carpenters may find it profitable to travel to Europe to get paid in Euros...  this is great news for the green economy and energy maniufacturing in the US, that will always have a basic materials and workmanship component... if the government and people get on the stick to push or incent the technological aspect, in which we are being beaten out by China and Europe so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement with your points about needing to create things here.  But the software etc. ARE things that are being created here.  Though they are intangible, they begin a string of value in capturing people&#8217;s interests and hosting advertising and sales of merchandise.  Use mlb.com as an example of the wave of integrated information and sales&#8230;  And they are uniquely American: Americans know best how to devise software that will capture other Americans&#8217;s imagination.  As far as creating other goods, lately nothing beats the price of goods arriving on a slow boat from emerging Asian countries, or else Target and Walmart would have thought of it.  And farm labor is done by the underclass here.  If you doubt that, check out articles about how Colorado&#8217;s apples went unpicked when the Feds cracked down on the underclass there.  Some things may change:  with our federal deficit reaching 10% of our GNP this year, the most since WWII, our currency will devalue and we may become a cheap manufacturer again&#8230; or our carpenters may find it profitable to travel to Europe to get paid in Euros&#8230;  this is great news for the green economy and energy maniufacturing in the US, that will always have a basic materials and workmanship component&#8230; if the government and people get on the stick to push or incent the technological aspect, in which we are being beaten out by China and Europe so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
